• Home
  • About Ian Fairlie
  • News and comments
  • My publications
  • Scientific references
  • Lectures
  • Useful links
  • Contact Ian

Dr Ian Fairlie

An independent consultant on radioactivity in the environment.

Ancient Hunterston B reactors allowed to restart: letters to Newspapers

September 30, 2020

This letter was sent to the editors of the Scotsman and the Herald on September 25, 2020.

Sirs

Very recently, the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) gave permissions to EDF to re-start for six months two ancient, unsafe reactors at the Hunterston B nuclear power station on the Clyde coast. These reactors are among the oldest in the world and should have been closed over a decade ago. They have been shut for 2 ½ years in one case and 1 ½ years in the other because they were unsafe due to large numbers of cracks and the loss of graphite in their cores. These are fundamentally serious matters as these cores moderate the flow of neutrons which essentially power the reactors.

The ONR claims that EDF have done computer modelling and made predictions that the reactors are likely to be safe for another six months. But EDF’s modelling in the past has a poor track record. The reality is that no one can predict with certainty how graphite cores will react more than a decade past their official closing dates. Even worse, the ONR has indicated they may even give longer permissions for up to a year.

In our view, the ONR’s surprising decisions are an affront to any concept of the Precautionary Principle which says we should err on the side of safety. Instead ONR is saying we are not 100% sure but go ahead anyway. This is unacceptable and we object in the strongest terms.

The essence of the matter is that while the probability of a serious nuclear accident at Hunterston B remains low, the possible consequences are so large – the radioactive contamination of Central Scotland – that such risks should not be undertaken by any reasonable authority. It is disturbing that the ONR has refrained from publishing any analyses of possible worst-case scenarios and their probabilities.

Who will benefit from these re-starts? EDF in Paris, France will see the income of their UK subsidiary rise. Who will be exposed to the inherent risks? The populations of Edinburgh and Glasgow, as these cities could be contaminated by radioactive fallout in the event of a serious nuclear accident such as occurred at Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Both the Westminster and the Scottish Governments have roles here but their silence is deafening. This is an abdication of their paramount duty of care to the Scottish people. As Cicero, the Roman consul, stated two thousand years ago, the safety of the people is the supreme law.

We call upon the Scottish Government to intervene and request the ONR to re-consider their unwise decisions at Hunterston B.

Dr Ian Fairlie, Vice President CND (for correspondence)

Dr Richard Dixon, Director, Friends of the Earth (Scotland)

Linda Grainey, local resident

Professor Lynn Jamieson, University of Edinburgh,  Chair of Scottish CND

Alannah Maurer, local resident

Elizabeth McLardy MBE, local resident

Ellen Renton, local resident

Peter Roche, Environmental Consultant

Dr David Toke, Reader, University of Aberdeen

Share

Recent Posts

  • French Report ” Nuclear Power Plant Flexibility at EDF”
  • Concerns over proposed tritium discharges from Fukushima – why no apparent concern about the larger tritium releases from Hunterston B and Torness?
  • Ancient Hunterston B reactors allowed to restart: letters to Newspapers
  • UK Electricity: Renewables and the problem with inflexible nuclear
  • Green New Deals and Nuclear Power: should Nuclear Colonialism be permitted to continue?

Archives

© 2010-2021 Dr Ian Fairlie

Site development by Lynx Graphic Design