In August 2016, I wrote an article for The Ecologist  indicating that the widespread belief that nuclear power was a good source of employment was a myth. In fact, a shibboleth. The article stated that Office for National Statistics (ONS) data for 2014 indicated only 15,500 direct jobs in nuclear power compared with 43,500 direct … [Continue Reading]

Comments on the November 2016 report “A Health Impact of Unconventional Oil and Gas in Scotland” by Health Protection Scotland (HPS) http://www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/resourcedocument.aspx?resourceid=3102 Summary: The HPS report downplays the dangers of radiation and radioactive contamination from UOG. It does this by selective use of the available facts and data, by pointing to weak epidemiological evidence and … [Continue Reading]

Recently, UNSCEAR published its latest report, UNSCEAR 2016. Several colleagues have pointed out that Annex C of the UNSCEAR report discusses the radionuclides of tritium and carbon-14. They have requested my views on the UNSCEAR report. In particular, paragraph 304 on page 320 of the full report (ie plus annexes) dismisses the view that the … [Continue Reading]

The Kinlen hypothesis debunked A recent COMARE report on child cancers near NPPs was published on the day after the Government committed the UK to a new nuclear power station. This was not a coincidence: it is a prime example, among many, of nuclear policy-led science.  We should have science-led policies but these rarely, if … [Continue Reading]

Many readers will have seen the interesting Panorama programme on the poor safety record at Sellafield broadcast on BBC 1 on September 5. The BBC press release stated this was a “special investigation into the shocking state of Britain’s most hazardous nuclear plant…” and it certainly was.  Perhaps the most important of several whistleblower revelations … [Continue Reading]

First of all, apologies to the many readers who have written complaining about the lack of new blogs/information on this website. The explanation is that I’ve been busy for the past 5 months writing a new report on the health effects of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster -TORCH-2016. This is an update of the 2006 … [Continue Reading]

Over the past two years, many media articles have been critical of the UK Government’s ill-conceived plans to build a new nuclear plant at Hinkley C in Somerset in the UK. Not a single article has been in favour, as far as can be seen. This unanimous chorus is unprecedented in its wide breadth, its … [Continue Reading]

New emerging evidence from Fukushima shows that nuclear disasters and their aftermaths can kill thousands of people due to necessary evacuations. Between 2011 and  2014, about 2,000 Japanese people, including many old people, died from ill-heath and suicides connected with the evacuations. Some nuclear advocates, including government officials, have said these deaths are the fault … [Continue Reading]

On June 26 2015, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) stated it was seeking public comments by September 8, on petitions stating that the Linear No Threshold theory of radiation’s effects was not a valid basis for setting radiation standards and that the hormesis model should be used instead. Several US readers have written asking … [Continue Reading]

In 2013, I discussed several epidemiological studies providing good evidence of radiogenic risks at very low exposure levels. A powerful new study (1) has been published in Lancet Haematology which adds to this evidence. However the study’s findings are more important than the previous studies, for several reasons. First, it provides “strong evidence”, as stated … [Continue Reading]